Vegetarianism Or Meat Consumption

Vegetarianism Or Meat Consumption All along with the existing trend of consuming organic and confined foods, one of the burning issues that has flickered debate amongst scholars and researchers alike is the subject of being, or not to exist as a vegetarian, have an effect on the surroundings. According to Spencer, those who consider that vegetarianism has a constructive effect on the setting argue that the enormous invention of animal foodstuffs for human utilization can assert to land dilapidation, water and atmosphere contamination, and even modify climate (21). Educational research designate that these damaging effects ensue as we persist to produce red meat foodstuffs. However, an appraisal of observations from vegan and meat consumer social network bloggers depicts that the individual desire for preference especially choices concerning the crucial want for foodstuff is the mainly important stature in this argument (Spencer 23). To report for persons who opt to consume meat regardless of the reimbursement of vegetarianism for the surroundings, the problem then crop up and stand to be: how can people formulate meat- consumption in extra sustainable manner? The responsibility of meat in the person mode of eating has been positioned as the middle of attention of an extensive variety of studies. In addition, proficient persons from diverse environments have scrutinized its edifying and nutritional consequence. Various types of foods all along have not received much criticism and are highly appreciated by different cultures than meat. This may occur due to complications, in health, regarding meat eating or due to principles and surroundings of the product production (Waldman and Lamb 34). As such, various arguments confront the meat consumption in different countries dietary patterns. Many research conducted shows that vegetarian diets or extremely little consumption of meat are associated with less or no complications and diseases and higher life expectancies. Many nations are also in progress showing concerns on ethical matters, like animal wellbeing and the ecological costs of their utilization outlines. This is because meat creation is particularly supply inefficient in contrast to further types of provisions production. It incorporates a load on the ecological unit by taking up a great quantity of water, territory and power (Gardner, Starke and Rosbotham 56). These factors have been having a great impact and shaping the growth of contemporary vegetarianism. Meat use has negative and positive results. The report that an individual is what he or she eats ought to make people to change their view on eating a lot of meat if they need a healthy prospect. Today, a variety of diseases like hypertension, obesity and high cholesterol among many others are wide stretch in many communities (Waldman and Lamb 78). Meat is extremely high in content of fats particularly saturated fat. At hand, are plentiful claims nowadays about saturated plump. Some say that we do not need any soaked fat to live, or that all saturated fat is awful, while others tell us to eat liberally and that this stuff is essential for our wellbeing. While not all inundated fat is bad, saturated fat from mammal products like meat seems to directly affect the role of our cardiovascular structure in many negative habits (Bishop 51). Not only is it connected to putting a sprain on ones heart through probable fat deposits in the arteries, mounting ones blood pressure and causing artery harm, but also it is the main fat responsible for hazardous weight increase. Todays meat is still higher than ever in fat as a result of how the animals are brought up, with no exercise or natural grazing capabilities (Spencer 89). For this reason, such animals sit in an enclosed area and eat extra food, which causes higher harmful fat deposits than usual. Meat is extremely dense in calories. This is because meat contains a lot of fats, and cholesterol is considered as a nutrient with the most calories. It is a substance that if eaten repeatedly or in extra doses can easily cause an increase in weight. Production of meat is seriously responsible for change in climate. Flora and fauna cause the production of natural gas, which is mainly methane. Methane is an extremely strong greenhouse gas. This is because it readily and easily traps more heat and in large amounts than carbon dioxide. Actually, animal production is accountable for about eighteen percent of the climate change in the globe. In essence, this can be compared with transport in the world with animal production exceeding global transportation (Silva and Webster 92). Meat raised under demanding conditions has a harmfully altered biochemistry that negatively alters ours. Immediately one thinks about himself or herself and what transpires during a strenuous moment. The most significant thing that occurs to all animals during a stressful period is stress hormones elevation. This initializes an entire slew of other reactions of biochemicals, which causes the health of a healthy animal to deteriorate. This of course leads to various illnesses. When we consume this meat, whether one holds the Eastern outlooks of changes in qi energy, Karma and, therefore, chakra disturbances or not, consuming meat from strained animals is connected with various negative psychological and emotional states of persons in us, as well (Gardner, Starke and Rosbotham 137). Meat manufactures carcinogenic compounds when safe to eat. It also adds to chances of colon cancer. Away from the heterocyclic amines talked about on top, meat cannot clear instantly from the persons intestines. This is unless sufficient fiber becomes a part of each food. This is mostly due to the fact that meat is lofty in protein and protein takes an extremely long time to get fully assimilated; thus, it sits in our bowels the highest. This time issue allows any carcinogenic complex to do the most harm to the lining of the intestinal walls (Silva and Webster 193) Having seen the above numbers, now think of the amount of water wasted every year to raise the food to feed these animals. Also, the amount of water wasted to ensure that they are hydrated while they continue developing. In order for land to be fully suitable for animal creation, land must be properly cleaned, and this usually involves the cutting and clearing of many trees. Production of stock accounts for thirty percent of the whole land surface of the globe (Bishop 164). Just think of how many people in the globe can be fed and have clean water to take if such a resource was not being used by the billions in the natural world. As eating too much meat can be treacherous, meat can be said to be a great source with complete proteins. The body needs these proteins to maintain a cellular hankie. As such, it is a brilliant idea to feed on some amount of meat each time. The Agricultural Department of America highly suggests that adults need to feed on 5-6 ounces of meat each day (Silva and Webster 125). Another reason why people should eat meat is based on the cultural other than nutritional importance. Various scholars like to relate meat consumption with virility as well as the patriarchal traditions. Women are viewed to be less meat consumers because of their great concern on health issues while men tend to take a lot of it basing on the gender attitudes placed by their cultures. High meat consumption; for example, in Western countries, their diet is compared to an expression of authority of humans in control of all the natural humanity. This can explain the reason behind the historical value placed on meat by the strong and influential elites. Their denial to marginalize the fewer dominant groups further explains the value placed on meat consumption (Bishop 121). Meat consumption is also related to various values and attitudes. Individual values are recognized to be the best attitude shapers but their sway on actions is not straight. The breach between thoughts and behavior is known, moreover, has been investigated by a number of instigators Silva and Webster (125) clarified that when mind-sets are on a broad concern, which is hard to relay with the action itself, people will less likely indulge in it. Therefore, when a populace is inquired they utter being concerned on climate alteration, although they do not decrease their regularity in smoking, driving or red meat ingestion. The proposal plan to help curb the problems caused by excessive meat consumption is as follows. The arrangement to be followed to make certain a healthy future involves banning all meat manufacture. In order to make the nearly all drastic impact on the emission of climate shifting gases, this proposal propose that all meat products, and their production, ought to be halted instantly. If one is consuming too much meat, one should incorporate other protein sources that are non-meat instead of meat (Spencer 110). Dairy products, legumes, beans and whole grains products of food all have protein. Soy foods, nuts, eggs and seeds can be considered good options. While seafood and fish may technically be regarded as meats, such products do not have the same risks compared to poultry, pork and red meat, since they are so low in soaked cholesterol and fats and cholesterol (Waldman and Lamb 77). Seafood and fish can comfortably replace meat in a persons diet; they supplement well. The suggestion will work as the body requires approximately 8 grams of protein in each twenty pounds of body weight per daylight. You can get a lot of this protein from non-meat foundations. Protein sources of non-meat mostly do not have as much cholesterol or saturated fat as meat, especially red meat (Waldman and Lamb 79). These sources also mostly consist of minerals, vitamins and healthy fats that ones body requires. Societies eating animal pedestal diets tend to have extremely poor wellbeing. The Inuits have the lowest life expectancy in North America, the uppermost rates of osteoporosis in the planet, and epidemic rates of stroke, cancer, and parasitic illnesses. Inuit mummies have exhibited symbols of the same diseases, so it is not just a difficulty with their modern go on a diet. The Masai are notorious for aging rapidly, and have high rates of bone deformities and atherosclerosis. Their arteries were analyzed and found to be comparable to old men in the United States (Bishop 139). Something ironic is that proponents of a high meat diet point to these peoples as examples of physical conditions. The same approach can be compared to tobacco legislation that bans all types of promotion and support to protect community health, the surroundings and reducing deficiency. Tobacco just like meat has a great negative impact on health. Knowledge of the lethal harms rooted by tobacco goods is not latest, but the strenuous internationalization attempt to decrease the exploit of tobacco by regulation and rule is more current. I know simply transiting such a regulation is not sufficient. Proper execution is needed to attain the anticipated profits. The same implies to the proposal on meat consumption (Spencer 163). The suggestion that complete burn on meat production has a counter disagreement and rebuttal since it favors the vegetarians in a wider viewpoint is flawed. Some individuals believe that meat consumption gives them a lot of nutrition values as compared to other foodstuffs. Accordingly, I think being a vegetarian out of compassion is unreasonable. I mean that in the common sense: it is a non sequitur, and thus irrational. It is like treating animals as people, and yet they are not. I have looked and paid attention far and wide and there is just no logically valid argument that proceeds from I ought to be empathetic to I ought to be a vegetarian. Agricultural and eating animals is simply not vice, for the reason I affirmed: our own overall life satisfaction depends on being sympathetic, and compassion compels us not to like or want pointless torment, and to continue living, no matter what or who is experiencing it. This would cause you pain, and thus lessen your life satisfaction, to be an unkind or wholly indifferent being. However, demolishing an animal humanely is not brutal. In addition, it is not destroying a person. Once more, an animals life is indifferent to when it passes away since it becomes nothing and is unaware of being somewhat. Thus eating animals is fine as long as you are not torturing them (Gardner, Starke and Rosbotham 245) Conclusion I consider that the development of vegetarianism is a slow procedure and that the shift from red meat to white meat intake, the perceived negative attitudes towards our commercial food system and the shift towards more socialist values are certainly part of this progress. Modern vegetarianism has developed over the past 200 years. It has established institutions which have promoted vegetarianism and the creation of alternatives to meat use.

Artifacts Used in Aztec History

Artifacts Used in Aztec Households in Mexican History Kelly Ferguson Anthropology 201 Name: Obsidian Blade Catalog #: 30 / 922 A Museum: American Museum of Natural History During Aztec history, obsidian was used in various ways, such as cutting cloth, hide, and wood. The Aztecs also made efficient weapons and cutting tools, because obsidian flakes into sharp glassy edges when reworked. When used as knives, obsidian was usually embedded in a wood handle to protect the wielder.These knives were used in auto-sacrifice, or â€Å"blood letting†, a ritual where a person would cut themselves and drip blood to honor ancestors or gods. Obsidian is one of the sharpest natural minerals in the world, and is even sharper when reworked into an edge. Obsidian was an important part of life in Mesoamerican history – in many ways, it helped build the economy there. It was a vital part of the trade and distribution of goods in Latin America. Variations of this reworked stone have been fou nd in almost every Aztec archeological site and ruin, usually reshaped into a tool or figurine.Eventually, carvers began to make a new variety of obsidian objects – jewelry, figurines, ear-spools, pokers, etc. This artifact, among others, was donated by M. H. Saville to the museum in 1896. Name: Stamp Catalog #: 30. 2/ 8763 Museum: American Museum of Natural History This artifact, a Mesoamerican clay stamp, is from the Post-Classic Aztec period, sometime between 1000-1521 CE. It was constructed from clay and reworked to create a design of waves and lines. This stamp specifically was donated by an anonymous donor as a gift to the museum in 1947.These clay stamps were molded and then baked to harden – afterwards, they were distributed across Mexican households of different social-economic status. For much of history, stamps have been used as a way of identifying a family or social group, along with a business or governmental body. In the Aztec world, stamps were used to apply color and ink to paper, cloth, pottery, and the human form, as well. Inks were made of local herbs, ranging in color and texture.In many cases, the stamp may show images of religion, local sights, god-figures, nature, or family, among others. This artifact in question consists of a multitude of lines and squiggles, resembling water or air, along with other parts of nature. Name: Pipe Catalog #: 30. 0/ 1812 Museum: American Museum of Natural History This piece is from the Post-Classic Aztec period, constructed between 1000 and 1521 CE. It is made of clay and has been polished to create an artistic sheen. The pipe (among others) was donated by Dr.Herbert Spinden after his expedition to Latin and Central America during his time working for the Museum of Natural History. During Aztec history, pipes were used for the ritual consumption of tobacco and herbs during household and community ceremonies. Much of the time, tobacco was either chewed or smoked, but smoke was also used to ki ll insects during harvest, or as a mild antiseptic. Tobacco use has been a key ingredient in the history of shamanism in Latin America, as well – along with the social life of everyday Aztec men and women.

The Reign of Charles V

Charles V reigned over a vast empire in a tumultuous age. The New World was a relatively recent discovery, and several other factors point to the idea that Charles V's reign coincided with a global transition into the modern age. Although Charles V's focus was primarily domestic (in the sense of Europe and the surrounding territory), the meeting of traditional values and modern ideology was one of many issues Charles faced, independence was another. Consolidating and re-consolidating his power was a problem that sapped much of Charles V's, and by extension his empire's, time and resources. From the papacy to the fiercely independent German coalition of prince-states, Charles often to had to take extra measures to enforce his policy in an empire that varied greatly from one polity to the next. Religion was another obstacle faced by Charles. The Protestant Reformation (steeped in the last vestiges of a somewhat anti-clerical Renaissance movement) appealed to many not only as more pious faith, but as a tool to be used for political maneuvering and opposition against an emperor whose motto was â€Å"Further beyond† (in regards to spreading the Christian faith). These concerns coupled with the always-present threat of foreign invasion made ruling over his empire an incredibly demanding and difficult task. Add to that the largely impractical and complex political process of the time, the question of finance, and a peasantry discontent synonymous with the values of the modern age, and you have a long and arduous list of problems faced by Charles. Although Charles the V was focused primarily on reform and maintenance rather than expansion, his conquering of the Aztecs and Incas can be considered brutal success and added greatly to the territory of New Spain. Cultural, economic, and political disparity throughout the empire, the search for financial backing (as well as questionable fiscal habits), foreign threat, and the problem of enforcing his often conventional policy in an era of change make the reign of Charles the V one worth studying. The empire preceded over by Charles encompassed many different cultures and made the vision of one wholly unified political entity hugely unfeasible, â€Å"By tradition he ruled only with the consent of the Imperial Diet, whose sheer size and diversity of interests made agreement almost impossible† (Maltby 22). As heir to not only the Habsburg dynasty, but a host of other territories (some of which his authority was unrecognized), Charles had to undertake the task of administrating over unique polities that themselves had issues administrating. Peasant unhappiness had long been an issue in medieval Europe, and combined with the scarcity of labor (due to the Black Death) peasants took on a new feeling of self-worth and importance. This often culminated in open revolt and passive resistance when the peasant class's demands were discarded as usual. This caused issues in management for the individual polities and on a larger scale for Charles. Charles had to deal with a huge difference in political process between any given polity, from the loose organization of the German States to the Cortes. Charles dealt with this largely on a by-issue basis, choosing to solve one problem at a time. This was in line with Charles's cautious nature, for a decision made to solve one problem could not be considered without regard to how it would affect the others, such is the nature of the interconnected problems facing him. Even unifying factors such as the church had trouble bringing together polities that were more often concerned with individual well being and privilege then with the welfare of the empire. Charles had too many issues too deal with at once, so he employed viceroys (regional governors) as extensions of imperial will. Many of Charles' problems stem from the lack of a unifying force in the empire, as unrealistic as it would be to imagine one at that time. A constant and expensive threat faced by Charles was that of foreign invasion. Charles was faced with defense of a â€Å"Vast patchwork of principalities that were neither geographically contiguous nor similar†¦ in culture or tradition† (Maltby 8). The frequent clashes with France and it's monarch Francis the I mark the most prominent campaign in â€Å"terms of blood and money† (Maltby 32). Charles developed a personal rivalry with Francis as evidenced by his repeated offers to settle huge disputes with a duel. Sometimes called the Habsburg-Valois rivalry, France was located dead in the center of Charles's empire. And with France's resources and military ambition rivaling that of Charles, conflicts between the two were frequent and costly. France's interest in the Italian peninsula fueled it's military conquests and was a continuation of French interest in the area dating back to Charles VIII's invasion in 1494. The French were defeated in 1525 (culminating in Francis's capture and the treaty of Madrid), inconclusively in 1529 (leading to the Treaty of Cambrai), and again inconclusively in 1538 with a truce (although the conflict would later start up with a renewed Frankish-Ottoman alliance). Charles owed much of his military success to his elite corps the tercios, a cohesive combination of â€Å"pikes with shot.. that would dominate European battlefields until the Thirty Years War† (Maltby 40). Some of the war successes and failures during conflict were directly related to advance in technology such as the bastion. Another threat, and one that endangered his very values, was that of the Islamic Ottoman empire. Starting out as one of many Christian raiding advocates of Islam, the Ottoman empire made territorial acquisitions at an alarming rate, especially alarming to the heavily Christian population at the time. The Ottoman empire found an able leader in Suleyman â€Å"The Magnificent† whose campaigns ended twice at Vienna due to logistical reasons. Failure to conquer the entirety of Charles's empire did not stop the sultan from dominating the Mediterranean and also unleashing the pirates upon Charles, some of who caused serious issues for him (Barbarossa) via harassment and guerrilla techniques. Charles's conflict with religion can be seen in his dealings with the Protestant Reformation (and a general anti-clerical position) as well as his subjugation of the papacy. Holding the title of Holy Roman Emperor had personal meaning to Charles, and his actions were often motivated by his desire to advance and protect the Christian faith. He met with opposition by not only the Protestant Reformation, but by a rebellious papacy concerned first with its own survival and second with the Christian faith. Although the papacy under Clement VII was largely pacified by instilling the Medici in Florence, the Reformation was not so easily quieted. The values behind the reformation attracted opportunists, condemners of the church, and peasant revolts alike, but the movement found a special foothold in the Germanic provinces. Besides using the new religion as a means of resisting imperial control, the princes had a more practical motivation, that by breaking with the church they could â€Å"Increase their revenues, strengthen their reserves of patronage, and gain control of†¦ institutions†¦. without alienating their subjects. † (Maltby 49). Actual proponents of the movement believed that it â€Å"offered a truer interpretation of the Gospels than that provided by the traditions of the Old Church† (Maltby 49). Whatever their justification, Charles V adopted a number of different stances concerning the Protestant Reformation. Domestically, the Inquisition was still active, and destroyed Spanish Protestantism (what little there was), and they also persecuted effectively any other movement that strayed from the accepted doctrine of the time. Concerning his less secure territorial acquisitions, Charles's stance ranged from tolerance to viewing Luther's doctrine as â€Å"False† and â€Å"Evil†, but the conflict manifested itself in the struggle between the Protestant formed Schmalkaldic League and Charles. Formed to be a united Protestant front against the still majority Christian Orthodoxy, The League was allowed to exist only as long as Charles was busy with the Ottomans. Once that threat had been neutralized (via treaty), Charles turned his attention elsewhere, namely to what he viewed as religious rebellion, the Schmalkaldic League. Charles, backed by papal troops, eradicated the league (who was plagued by authoritative indecisiveness) in a fashion reminiscent of the crusades. However the ever-present problem of enforcing his policy appeared in Charles's victory over the league. Many of the prince-states that re-converted remained largely protestant in population, placed no constrictions on the spread or practice of the faith, and some outright reverted back to Protestantism. Charles's legacy is often tainted by his fiscal actions. The empire needed mass amounts of money not only to function, but to finance Charles's martial actions. Charles's often depended on the system of redress after compensation, expected donations, and random windfalls. But by far his most relied upon source for money, were the banks. Charles borrowed heavily from many banks to support his endeavors. Often Charles could not repay the loan by the deadline, which led to a slew of re-negotiations, raised interest rates, and fees instituted by the banks to ensure profit. The relationship between them was initially symbiotic. Charles needed money and the banks were happy to profit off of the high interest rates and continued to supply him even when his credit dropped in the later years of his reign. Later in Charles's reign however, the banks realized he was no longer a safe nor profitable investment, which often forced him to resort to coercion to get the necessary funds. The diverse nature of the problems meant that no one solution would encompass the broad spectrum of issues facing Charles and his empire. Ranging from financial troubles, to foreign threat, to having core values that conflict with the changing times of that age, Charles allowed caution and his deep Christian values to guide him through those troubled times until his abdication and retirement to a monastery. Charles' reign certainly had its share of successes and failures, and Charles has been described as â€Å"not quite a good man, and not quite a great man† (Maltby 129), but he is certainly one worth re-examining, even four centuries later.

Mythic Hero s Journey The Odyssey And The Wizard Of Oz

Mythic/Hero’s Journey: The Odyssey and The Wizard of Oz The Mythic/Hero’s Journey is a story that has been passed down to every culture being told by people. The Mythic/Hero’s Journey is a path that is described as going to various stages. It has a beginning point which is the â€Å"ordinary point† and an ending point which is the â€Å"return.† Throughout this journey one encounters the call to adventure, refusal of call, mentor, crossing the threshold, enemies, death, reward, and road. These stages can be seen in many descriptions of the journey but some can be missed out on and the most important ones are just included. This journey can be seen in classical literature, modern literature,theater, film, and etc.. A modern literature may not†¦show more content†¦Throughout his journey, Athena saves Odysseus several times and gives him gifts and information that help him throughout his journey. Crossing the threshold, this stage five, when on the journey Odysseus and the others are traveling by boat whi ch means they are on sea. Poseidon who is the god of the sea is not a friend of Odysseus, this is because Odysseus blinded Polyphemus, the cyclops, who is Poseidon’s son. At this point Poseidon had created a storm that throws Odysseus and everyone else off course. Stage six includes Tests, allies and enemies, Odysseus faces many things such as the Lotus Eaters, Sirens, Scylla and Charybdis, and the Cattle of the Sun God. Odysseus and his crew end up in a land of lotus eaters due to the storm. The natives on the land give some of the men the intoxicating fruit, the fruit made them forget their longing for home and they just wanted to stay on the land and eat more lotus flowers. The Sirens are three dangerous women who seduce sailors nearby with their enchanting music and voices to cause a shipwreck. When Odysseus and some of his men were on sea, Odysseus tells his men to plug their ears with beeswax and make them tie him to the ship because he wanted to experience the sirens. Another challenge they face is Scylla and Charybdis. Scylla is a sea monster who lives under a dangerous rock, she threatens passing ships. In this journey Scylla eats six of Odysseus crew members. Charybdis is a